Post by nurnobisorker65 on Feb 11, 2024 6:20:28 GMT -4
As this constitutes, under the terms of article 2 of the Federal Constitution, one of the Powers of the Union, I express the interest of Union in the present case, therefore applying the provisions of article 109, I, of the 1988 Federal Constitution. On the other hand, in the case of a public civil action filed by the competent Federal Public Ministry, the Federal Court will be responsible for processing the case. This is because the Federal Public Ministry is an organ of the Union and under the terms of article 109, I of the Federal Constitution, federal judges are responsible for prosecuting and judging cases in which “the Union, autonomous entity or federal public company are interested as plaintiffs, defendants, assistants or.
Constitution, according to which it is up to federal judges to process and judge “cases in which the Union, autonomous entity or federal public company are interested as plaintiffs, defendants, assistants or opponents, except those of bankruptcy, accidents at work and those subject Belgium Email List to the Electoral Court and the Labor Court”. Thus, with the Federal Public Ministry, which is a Union body, as the author of the action, the jurisdiction for the case lies with the Federal Court. 3. (…) 4. (…) 6. In the case at hand, the case falls under the jurisdiction of the Federal Court, because the Federal Public Ministry, a Union body, appears as the author in it, which is legitimated to promote it, because it aims to.
protect clearly federal assets and interests, and not state, namely: the environment in a mangrove area, located on marine land and its additions, which are Union assets (CF, art. Constitutional Amendment No. 41/2003, which changed item XI of article 37, it was established that “(…) the remuneration and allowance of those occupying public positions, functions and jobs in direct, autonomous and foundational administration, of members of any of the Powers of the Union , of the States, of the Federal District and of the Municipalities, of those holding an elective mandate and other political agents and earnings, pensions or other types of remuneration, whether cumulatively received or not, including personal benefits.
Constitution, according to which it is up to federal judges to process and judge “cases in which the Union, autonomous entity or federal public company are interested as plaintiffs, defendants, assistants or opponents, except those of bankruptcy, accidents at work and those subject Belgium Email List to the Electoral Court and the Labor Court”. Thus, with the Federal Public Ministry, which is a Union body, as the author of the action, the jurisdiction for the case lies with the Federal Court. 3. (…) 4. (…) 6. In the case at hand, the case falls under the jurisdiction of the Federal Court, because the Federal Public Ministry, a Union body, appears as the author in it, which is legitimated to promote it, because it aims to.
protect clearly federal assets and interests, and not state, namely: the environment in a mangrove area, located on marine land and its additions, which are Union assets (CF, art. Constitutional Amendment No. 41/2003, which changed item XI of article 37, it was established that “(…) the remuneration and allowance of those occupying public positions, functions and jobs in direct, autonomous and foundational administration, of members of any of the Powers of the Union , of the States, of the Federal District and of the Municipalities, of those holding an elective mandate and other political agents and earnings, pensions or other types of remuneration, whether cumulatively received or not, including personal benefits.